Which court case is NOT associated with cell phone searches?

The case that is not associated with cell phone searches is Miranda v Arizona. This landmark case established the Miranda rights, requiring law enforcement to inform suspects of their rights during custodial interrogations. The focus of Miranda v Arizona was on the rights of individuals in custody and ensuring that any statements made by suspects are voluntary and informed. It does not address the issue of searching electronic devices or the privacy rights associated with cell phones.

In contrast, the other cases listed are directly related to the legal standards governing the search and seizure of cell phones. Chimel v California set important precedents about the search of a person’s immediate surroundings during an arrest, while both Riley v California and U.S. v Wurie specifically involved the requirement for law enforcement to obtain a warrant before searching a cell phone, recognizing the unique privacy interests associated with digital information.