Two important court cases involved in the Supreme Court ruling about cell phone searches are:

The correct answer highlights two critical court cases that significantly shaped the legal landscape regarding the search of cell phones by law enforcement. Riley v. California established that police must obtain a warrant before searching a cell phone seized during an arrest. The Court recognized that cell phones hold vast amounts of personal data and private information, which warrants greater privacy protections under the Fourth Amendment.

In tandem with this, U.S. v. Wurie further clarified issues surrounding digital data during routine searches. It reinforced the necessity for law enforcement to respect privacy rights in relation to cellphones. The combination of these two cases illustrates the evolving legal framework that acknowledges the uniqueness of digital information in an age where technology is pervasive.

Together, both Riley and Wurie set a precedent that requires law enforcement to obtain a warrant based on probable cause to access the contents of a cell phone, thereby upholding constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.